Answer To ???Not Metcalfe???s Paradox??? Puzzle
As usual, the puzzle’s been answered well by commenters. Jason points out that this is the Monty Hall Paradox and ??? what I shoulda checked for ??? the puzzle and answer are in wikipedia.
Here’s the puzzle for those who missed it:
You are a guest on a game show. There are three closed doors; behind one of them is a car you want to own; behind the other two are goats you don’t want despite the fact that they don’t burn gas.
You have to pick a door. After you do that, the host will pick a door behind which there is a goat (he knows what’s where and has to follow the rules). You then get to decide whether you should be awarded what’s behind the door you picked initially or what’s behind the door that neither of you picked.
The questions are:
Does it matter which strategy you pick?
If so, which strategy is favored?
What is the quantitative advantage, if any, of the favored strategy?
For extra credit: why?
The answer:
You want to pick what’s behind the door that was picked by neither you nor the host. If you stick with your first choice door, your odds of winning are 1 in 3. If you switch to the remaining door after you and the host pick, you increase your odds to 2 out of 3 of ending up with the car.
But this is counterintuitive. I had to be beaten into accepting it but it’s right. Here’s why:
Obviously, if you pick a door at random (you have no information so your choice IS random), your odds of picking a door with a car behind it are 1 in 3; that part’s easy. If you stick with the door you picked, you will win one third of the time and lose two thirds of the time.
Now suppose you follow the switching strategy. One third of the time you will have picked the door with the car initially. In this case you’ll lose, however, the other two thirds of the time you’ll win. That’s because you are actually getting help from the game show host when you follow this strategy and he DOES have information!
Let’s look more closely at what happens when you pick a goat door initially (which you will do two thirds of the time): In that case there are two doors left, one with a goat and one with a car. The host MUST pick the door with the goat (see rules above). That leaves only the door with the car which you then get to drive home. Whenever you pick a goat door first, you WILL win with the switching strategy thanks to the host eliminates the remaining goat door. Since your odds of picking a goat door are 2 in 3, you will win two thirds of the time with the switching strategy. QED.
If you don’t believe me, check many diagrams in wikipedia.
var OutbrainPermaLink=’http://blog.tomevslin.com/2008/07/answer-to-not-m.html’;
var OB_demoMode = false;
if ( typeof(OB_Script)!=’undefined’ )
OutbrainStart();
else
{
var OB_Script = true;
var str = “”;
document.write(str);
}
Social networks:
tag with del.icio.us |
digg it |
reddit |
Stumble It! |
other social networks
July 16, 2008 in Puzzles | Permalink
| Comments
| Blogroll
| Books
| Podcasts
| Search blog
| Subscribe
| Email this post
| |
||
|
Related posts
- No related posts.
Subscribes
Archives
-
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- November 1999
- January 1970
Sipy...
-
News, opinions and announcements about fast changing communication tools and technologies, from various blogs and ezine.
